Thursday, July 17, 2008

Muslim kids TV show sentences Jew-eating mascot to AMPUTATION

Absolutely sickening and barbaric. He steals, so in keeping with the Qur'an they want to whack off his hand! Watch the video here: MemriTV.com
  • Note that the little girl host said that Mohammad said:
  • "If my daughter Fatima had stolen, I would have
  • chopped off her hand." For a much better role model than
  • Mohammad, we suggest people take a look at a good alternative,
  • with, uh, no barbaric amputations for small crimes: SecularHumanism.org.

If this little girl who hosts this show were to take up democratic Secular Humanism, then she'd become much more civilized. We hope that she'll take us up on that.


Following are excerpts from a Hamas children's show, titled "The Pioneers of Tomorrow," which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on July 11, 2008.
  1. Assud the bunny: In the name of Allah,
  2. I hope my dad doesn't see me. God, make
  3. him go on sleeping,
  4. while I take one or two bills. There's his stash of money... Man, there is so much money here... No, I must put it back. Stealing is forbidden.
Satan: No, no... What are you doing, Assud? No, Assud, I promised you that nobody would see you or know about this. Take one or two bills. Don't be afraid, Assud.

Assud: Okay, I'll just take one... Actually, I'll take two.

Satan: No, take three.

[...]

Voice of girl: Assud, you were wrong to follow Satan, who is the source of all problems. In addition, you caused problems between your parents. You have no right to cause such a great problem. Don't you know that stealing leads to Hell. The Prophet Muhammad said: "If my daughter Fatima had stolen, I would have chopped off her hand." If you were in Saudi Arabia now, they would chop off your hand. Allah said in the Koran: "As for a thief, male or female, cut off their hands: A punishment by example, for their crime."

[...]

Child TV host Saraa: What do you think about what Assud did?

Asmaa: It was wrong, because "as for a thief, male or female, cut of their hands."

Assud: Oh my God! You say that my hand should be chopped off, Asmaa?

Asmaa: Yes.

Assud: You think my hand should be chopped off?

Asmaa: What?

Assud: You want my hand to be chopped off?

Asmaa: Yes.

[...]

Nur: The Prophet Muhammad said: "If my daughter Fatima had stolen, I would have chopped off her hand.

Assud: So if Saraa were to steal, her hand should be chopped off, right?

Nur: No.

Assud: When you were little, didn't you ever steal a shekel or something?

Nur: No, because Allah is watching me.

Saraa: Nur, do you think we should go ahead and chop off Assud's hand now?

Assud: No, no. Saraa, I'm begging you...

Nur: Saraa, he has repented and promised never to do it again, then that's it.

Saraa: Well, if we don't chop off his hand, maybe we should chop off his ear?

Assud: No, please, no, I'm begging you...

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

A plurality of Muslims under 35 support there being areas of the UK where some elements of sharia law are introduced

A better alternative to the beheadings, torture, stoning to death, torture/murder of gays, blatant discrimination against women, etc. that exists under Sharia Law, would be to check out Buddhaweb.org


Article from The Spectator:

A friend of Coffee House is in touch to point out that the numbers from the ICM poll for Peter Oborne’s Dispatches programme last night, show that a plurality of Muslims under 35 are in favour of there being some parts of the UK where elements of Sharia are introduced. Here are the numbers:

"Would you support or oppose there being areas of Britain in which some element of Sharia Law is introduced?"

.......................All......34 and under.......35 and over
Support:.........38.............44 ........................30
Oppose:..........46.............39.........................54

These numbers are worrying. As Paul Goodman, the Tory shadow minister for Communities and Local Government, said in a Spectator interview last summer: ‘Moderate Islam has as its core not wishing to see different people living under different law. Not wishing to see sharia incorporated into British law.’ [...]

Read it all>>

Marxism failed in both theory and practice


Marxism is a miserable failure, as proven by the appalling conditions that people in N. Korea and Cuba live under every day.

This picture is a night-time satellite photo of North and South Korea....truly incredible, when you think about it. The North can't provide lights for their own people at night.

They also can't even FEED their people, as this article from Amnesty International shows:
"For more than a decade, the people of North Korea have suffered from famine. Hundreds of thousands of people have died as a result of acute food shortages caused by natural disasters and economic mismanagement."

They'd do well in those countries to learn from this Online U.S. Constitution

The following article points out the failures of Marxism:
Marxism failed in both theory and practice

What ideas do YOU have to help these people overcome their tyrannical dictators?

Photo from http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/weather-stations-in-korea/

Thursday, July 3, 2008

The Theory of Evolution turns 150 years old!

Happy Birthday to the best weapon ever discovered against mysticism and superstitions.

Here's a raised champagne glass to Charles Darwin. He's the Center for Democratic Humanism's "Hero Of the Week"!

Article

Cute puppy does what Islamic terrorists haven't - spark Muslim outrage



This cute little Infidel puppy has managed to do what Islamic
terrorists haven't - spark outrage in the Muslim world!

A better alternative to that belief system is to check out Buddhaweb.org.


From TheOPINIONATOR:

July 01, 2008
ANOTHER CASE OF THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG

Undoubtedly I am far from the only one who is absoutely SICK & TIRED of the muslim minority, in the UK, thinking that every bit of their culture should be implemented in Great Britain with NO regard to the thousands year old culture that the British people themselves have achieved and lived for millenia. (We could take this worldwide - but that is for a future blog) Let's face it - no one dragged these muslims, kicking and screaming into the UK. No one is forcing them to stay. Even more sickening is the British police and government who (for what appears to be on a daily basis) twist and turn themselves into apologetic dhimmi pretzels (let's emphasize that to DHIMMI PRETZELS) trying to appease bleating, whining and constantly "offended" muslims - offended by the same culture that THEY have chosen avail themselves - the same country that provides so many of those generous financial and physical benefits. This isn't just insidious multiculturalism - this is British cultural apartheid.

The muslim daily whinge and moan today - is none other than a picture of an adorable puppy sitting inside a police hat to advertise a new police non-emergency phone number. (I have written extensively about muslims & dogs - to read a few go here and here.) You would think, based on the muslim indignation, granted it is far short of that shown regarding the Danish MO-Cartoons or the Teddy Bear Teacher, but nevertheless defiant in its demands that the puppy poster not be used and vowing that, regardless of its importance, it will not be displayed in muslim businesses, etc.

Of course, based on past acrobatics used by politicians and police to instantly react to publicly appease the muslim community - local Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif immediatly contacted Tayside Police Chief Constable John Vine to discuss the "offence". Asif said: 'My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards. It was probably a waste of resources going to these communities....'People who have shops just won't put up the postcard. Apparently the "expected" apologetic statement, from the Chief Constable came forthwith: 'This was an oversight and did not seek to offend or upset.'

Oversight? Why is it that the muslims think that every niche and cranny of British life, culture, mores, etc must first be approved by muslims? (Is it because the constant drumbeat of government and police appeasement?) Yet when it comes to muslims and the stealth implementation of Sharia Law into the UK or its customs -some of which are untenable and barbaric -- the British people (and everyone else) are immediately labeled as Islamophobic if great respect and subservience is not immediately shown. This is exactly what muslims want, expect and unfortunately have so far succeeded in establishing not only in the UK but most of Europe. [...]

See more at TheOPINIONATOR

N. Korea and U.S. heading in a peaceful direction!

Now, uh, if N. Korea could just stop torturing/murdering people in Gulags, who don't agree with the "supreme leader for life". Check out the great people at HumanRightsWatch.org to help stop this atrocity.



U.S., North Korea change course

San Francisco Chronicle, in an editorial: "It's hard to miss the point. … North Korea blew up a 60-foot cooling tower at its main nuclear complex and invited foreign media to film away. (President) Bush himself read out the change in policy to give it full force. It's a big deal, both sides indicated. … Bush's acceptance of North Korea's gesture came with plenty of caveats. … But his words represent a major course correction. …

... (T)he latest softening of positions is welcome. The slow-dancing dubbed 'confidence building' by negotiators has taken years to produce modest results, but it's eased tensions. It also may have produced a new political product in the White House: a president willing to test, confer and take chances, not just confront and challenge." [...]

Read it all…

What ideas do YOU have to help free the N. Korean people from communist atrocities?

Amazingly, women can't be judges or clerics in Islam

In America, we used to be this backwards, but we realized the errors of our ways, and moved on in the name of equality.

In Bukhari 13/53 Mohammad forbade women from being judges. And women Islamic clerics are unheard of. In Qur’an 2:282 a woman’s testimony is only worth HALF of a man’s in court...no we're not making this up!

A better alternative for people to check into would be the brave group Women Living Under Muslim Law . Here's another example of a brave Muslim women standing up to the violent supremacists who do not want women to be leaders in the community:



Muslim councillor Hasina Khan: I will not let male bigots win

From The Times
July 3, 2008
Muslim councillor Hasina Khan: I will not let male bigots win
Election victory: Hasina Khan and her Tory opponent, Simon Parkinson

Election victory: Hasina Khan and her Tory opponent, Simon Parkinson
Marcus Leroux

A female Muslim councillor has been subjected to a hate campaign by Muslim men in her ward, leaving her unable to visit some of the streets that she represents.

Hasina Khan, 38, the only Muslim councillor in Chorley, Lancashire, said that she had suffered a barrage of threatening phone calls, verbal abuse and insulting graffiti because the men objected her public role.

Mrs Khan, a mother of three, said: “I've had to totally change the way I go about my job. I used to do ward walks all the time, but now there are some streets I can't even walk down.”

The hate campaign began when she put herself forward as a Labour candidate three years ago. “It is just a few members of the community who think I should be at home with a veil over my face, although if other people choose to do that, then I respect their choice,” she said.
“However, I feel that if it was a male Asian councillor then he would be treated as a hero. Because I am a woman I get the opposite treatment. They can't understand my mainstream views and those of ‘live and let live' and how the British culture should be respected ... It has been extremely hard for me and my family and if it wasn't for my British constituents, I don't think I would have been able to get through it.”

Terry Brown, the Mayor of Chorley, who represents the same ward as Mrs Khan, said: “Because she's a female Asian woman their view is that she should be at home producing babies.

“It's a shame. She's a well-respected member of the community and ... an exceptionally talented woman.”

Despite the campaign, Mr Brown insisted that there were no ethnic tensions in the area.

Mrs Khan, who blames the smear campaign on a small minority of Muslim men, said that she would not give into the threats. “This has gone on for too long and I will not sit back and let it happen any more ... Nobody should have to go through this, especially an Asian Muslim woman, as Islam is very protective and fair with women. It isn't just about me any more - it is about thousands of other women who are being held down by people who refuse to wake up to the reality that it is the 21st century.”

Dukandar Idris, the imam of Chorley's Dawat ul Islam mosque, said that Mrs Khan should have taken her grievances to the mosque's elders, rather than speaking out. He also questioned some of her claims: “Which streets can't she walk down?”

Read it all…


What solutions to this to YOU propose?

By Terry Martin
Director of Freedom News

Britain officially starts regressing towards the 7th century today

"Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain, says UK's top judge" (see article below.)

We at Freedom News don't think Brits realize that Sharia Law results in cutting off hands and feet of people who steal, as per the Islamic texts. Stoning to death people who have sex outside of marriage is also part of Sharia Law!...would, say, 50-70% of all Brits be stoned to death when Sharia takes full effect!? Secular rule is a much better alternative, as this group advocates: www.SecularIslam.org




Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain, says UK's top judge

By Steve Doughty
Last updated at 8:07 PM on 03rd July 2008

Explosive: The Lord Chief Justice's endorsement of Sharia law has already created huge controversy

The most senior judge in England tonight gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulate finance.

He declared: 'It is possible in this country for those who are entering into a contractual agreement to agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.'

In his speech in an East London mosque Lord Phillips signaled approval of sharia principles as a means of settling disputes so long as no punishments that conflict with the established law are involved, and as long as divorces are made to comply with the civil law.

But his remarks - which give the green light from the highest judicial office to the informal sharia courts already operated by numerous mosques - provoked a storm of criticism.

Lawyers warned that family and marital disputes settled by sharia could leave women or vulnerable people at a serious disadvantage.

Tories said that equality under the law must be respected and warned that outcomes incompatible with English law should never be enforceable.

Lord Phillips spoke five months after Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams surrounded himself in controversy with a lecture in which he suggested Islamic law could have official status and that it could govern marital law, financial transactions and arbitration in disputes.

The Lord Chief Justice said today of the Archbishop's views: 'It was not very radical to advocate embracing sharia law in the context of family disputes.'
[...]

Read it all…


What are your thoughts?

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Iran slams Britain’s conferring knighthood on Salman Rushdie

The Iranians REALLY REALLY need to read the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Civilized people don't put DEATH FATWAS (like Iran did) on accomplished authors they simply disagree with...they debate them, instead! Can the Brits expect an embassy to be bombed like the Danish Embassy was bombed in Pakistan for the 'atrocity' of simply publishing cartoons of Mohammad like the Danes allowed?



Iran slams Britain’s conferring knighthood on Salman Rushdie

TEHRAN, July 01 (ISNA)-Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman condemned on Tuesday Britain’s conferring knighthood on the apostate writer Salman Rushdie.

Rushdie with his 1988 novel “The Satanic Verses'' severely insulting to Islam angered Muslims across the world.

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II on Wednesday gave Salman Rushdie the knighthood which was announced last year.

The decision to honor the infidel author was taken by Tony Blair, Brown's predecessor as prime minister. There were also protests in Iran, Malaysia and other parts of the Muslim world.

Current insults to Islam are all consequences of Britain’s wrong approaches; Mohammad Ali Husseini said adding Iran condemns conferring awards on Rushdie by Britain or other Britain-linked organization.

He also moved to Iran’s nuclear program issue and said contrasting Iran’s activities fully within IAEA rules with those of other countries are only for political purposes.

As confirmed by the IAEA chief’s report Iran’s enrichment activities have never violated regulation, he added.

The US and some European counties have always accused Iran of producing nuclear arms; Tehran denying the charge says the program only intends to generate electricity to meet the country’s mounting needs.
[...]


From http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-1156957&Lang=E

Morocco: Women must not marry non-Muslim European men, says imam

Reforming that verse in the Qur'an is the best positive solution to give Moroccan women their freedom. no? See ReformIslam.org for more positive steps towards freedom for our Islamic friends.


From http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.2284553321

Morocco: Women must not marry non-Muslim European men, says imam
Rabat, 25 June (AKI) - An imam in Morocco's eastern city of Fez has said that marriages between Moroccan women and European men who are not Muslims are forbidden under Islam.

Each summer in Morocco, a growing number of local women are reportedly marrying young European men.

"This kind of marriage, between Moroccan women and European men, is forbidden by the Koran (the Muslim holy book) and the Sunna (the way or deeds of the Prophet Mohammed)," Sheikh Mohammed al-Tawil said in a TV interview.

"A Muslim woman may not marry an unbeliever while a Muslim man may marry Christian and Jewish women," he told Arabic satellite TV network al-Arabiya.
[...]